Which statement is true regarding a DNR order executed in Texas?

Which statement is true regarding a DNR order executed in Texas?

• A. It must be signed in front of a judge
• B. Only verbal orders are accepted
• C. It must have written responses for verification
• D. It does not require a physician's signature

Answer: (C)

The statement that it must have written responses for verification is accurate in the context of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order executed in Texas. In Texas, a DNR order must be documented in writing to ensure clarity and to serve as a reliable reference for healthcare providers. This is crucial because DNR orders directly impact the medical care provided to a patient in emergency situations. The documentation also aids in verifying that the patient's wishes are respected, as well as offering protection to medical personnel from legal repercussions related to those wishes. In the case of DNR orders, having written verification ensures that all parties involved—patients, families, and healthcare providers—understand the implications and specifics of the order. This written documentation is vital for maintaining effective communication and avoiding misunderstandings during critical care situations. While the other statements mentioned do contain elements relevant to DNRs, they do not align with the requirements outlined in Texas law. For example, a physician's signature is typically necessary for a DNR to be valid, and it is not sufficient to rely solely on verbal orders. The requirement for a signature underlines the importance of formalizing the DNR order within the appropriate legal and medical frameworks.

The statement that it must have written responses for verification is accurate in the context of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order executed in Texas. In Texas, a DNR order must be documented in writing to ensure clarity and to serve as a reliable reference for healthcare providers. This is crucial because DNR orders directly impact the medical care provided to a patient in emergency situations. The documentation also aids in verifying that the patient's wishes are respected, as well as offering protection to medical personnel from legal repercussions related to those wishes.

In the case of DNR orders, having written verification ensures that all parties involved—patients, families, and healthcare providers—understand the implications and specifics of the order. This written documentation is vital for maintaining effective communication and avoiding misunderstandings during critical care situations.

While the other statements mentioned do contain elements relevant to DNRs, they do not align with the requirements outlined in Texas law. For example, a physician's signature is typically necessary for a DNR to be valid, and it is not sufficient to rely solely on verbal orders. The requirement for a signature underlines the importance of formalizing the DNR order within the appropriate legal and medical frameworks.